Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Sizer Steel Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 10, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a motion to impress an attorney’s lien upon a fund in the custody of the receivers of the defendant corporation appointed by this court. The petitioners eoncededly have performed legal services at the request of the insolvent corporation in the settlement and adjustment of income tax matters pending before the United States Department of Internal Revenue. The subject-matter arose from an alleged tax indebtedness amounting to $232,026.78, which, in consequence of petitioners’ services, was finally adjusted with the government at $18,413.80, and after the receivers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. In re Baxter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. In the Matter of H____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Mandel-Witte Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1941
  3. Albright v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  4. Dempsey v. PinkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Meacham v. Ballard Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API