Charest v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Application of J. C. Remi Cbarest to tbe district court for Pennington county for an order to show cause why J. M. Bishop should not pay over to Hortense Oharest the sum of $1,000. J. M. Bishop appeared specially and his motion to dismiss the' proceeding was denied; respondent’s demurrer to the complaint was overruled. The matter was heard by Grindeland, J., who made findings and granted the application. From the order granting the application, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Petitioner in this proceeding was formally charged with the commission of a crime by a warrant issued out of the municipal court of the city of Thief River Falls, Pennington county, this state. He was arrested and taken before the court for a preliminary hearing, and retained respondent as his counsel, who is an attorney and counselor at law residing and practicing as such in said city and county. The arrest was made on May 29, 1915, and the hearing was had on June 4 following, at the conclusion of which petitioner was held to await the action of the grand jury, bail being fixed at the sum of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- In the Matter of H____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Schell v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Union Building & Saving Ass'n v. SoderquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Landro v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hollister v. UlviSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- People's Savings Bank v. ChesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.