St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Broulette
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from parts of a judgment of tbe district court .for Polk county, in favor of defendant, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Ives, J.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This is an action of ejectment to recover from tbe defendant tbe possession of tbe S. E. of section 3, township 150, range 45, in Polk county in tbis state. Tbis land is within tbe indemnity limits of tbe grant to tbe territory and state by acts of congress of March 3, 1857,2 March 3, 1865,3 and March 3, 1871,4 to aid in tbe construction of certain railroads, and was- patented to the state of Minnesota by tbe United States February 13,1889, and deeded by tbe state to tbe plaintiff March 13, 1889. Tbe defendant claims that in tbe spring of 1877 one Frank Robert made improvements…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. GreenalghSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- St. Paul, M. & M. R. v. GreenhalghU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Shadewald v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Martinka v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Duluth Terminal Railway Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.