Legal Opinion

St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Greenalgh

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1891No. 24PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT' COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

The plaintiff, the St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railway Company, is a corporation created under the laws of Minnesota. The defendants are citizens of that State; and James Gfreenalgh, the grantee of his co-defendant, Charles W. Greenalgh, who received a patent of the United States, claims title to the land covered by that patent. The controversy in the case is over the ownership of this land, the plaintiff contending that it is a part of the grant made by Congress to the State of Minnesota on the 3d of March, 1857, to aid in the construction of certain railroads, and by the State…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Barney v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. BrouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. United States v. Oregon & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1911
  5. Dugan v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API