Legal Opinion

St. Paul, M. & M. R. v. Greenhalgh

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtBRewer, J.

These causes are so nearly alike that they may be considered together. The complainant claims to be the equitable owner of certain lands, the legal title to which is in defendants, and filed these bills to enforce such claim. Both tracks lie along the line of the St. Vincent extension of complainant’s railway, and north of the indemnity limits of the Northern Pacific road. The definite location of this line was made in 1871, and a map thereof filed with *564the secretary of the interior, and approved December 20,1871. The Greenhalgh land is within ten miles of this line, and the Wenzel tract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Schulenberg v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Nash v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. BrouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. United States v. Oregon & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API