Legal Opinion

Mangano v. Altmeyer

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Petitioner, an employee in the coat and suit industry, seeks in this article 78 proceeding, to review a determination of the Appeals Committee of the Coat and Suit Industry’s Retirement Fund which declared him ineligible for retirement fund benefits. The question presented, at the very threshold, is whether such a determination is reviewable in an *842article 78 proceeding and the answer, under well-settled law, is that it is not.

The terms of the statute (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1283-1306), its legislative history (Third Annual Report of N. Y. Judicial Council, 1937, p. 133) and judicial decisions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toscano v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Matter of Towers Man. Corp. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. In re Weidenfeld against KepplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Weidenfeld v. . KepplerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Newman v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lade v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Phalen v. Theatrical Protective Union No. 1New York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API