Legal Opinion

Toscano v. McGoldrick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.

In this action at law for unpaid salary, the city has, so far successfully, challenged plaintiff’s right to bring the action on the general ground that the only remedy available for the relief sought is in the nature of mandamus under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act (L. 1937, ch. 526, as amd.) and which would therefore be barred by the four months ’ Statute of Limitations contained in section 1286 thereof.

Permission to appeal has been granted by the Appellate Division in the first judicial department.

The within action stems from the abortive act of the board of estimate taken when the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matter of Picone v. Comr. of LicensesNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Holroyd v. . Town of Indian LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. People Ex Rel. McCabe v. . MatthiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Thoma v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Quayle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Gerber v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Foy v. SchechterNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API