Lade v. Parker
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.
In this action, Dorothy M. Lade, as plaintiff, claims the New York State retirement benefits due her deceased husband under the terms of a separation agreement of 1941 in which the husband agreed to name her beneficiary of his interest. In 1957, without her knowledge or consent, he changed the beneficiary to the defendant, Mary Parker Lade, who was the last-named beneficiary at his death on November 5,1968. The plaintiff made application to the Comptroller for the bene*370fits, was granted an administrative hearing, but lost. The Comptroller noted that “ the benefits shall be paid to the member’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Sand v. BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Salinas v. SalinasNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Crowley v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Lade v. LevittNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Mangano v. AltmeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caravaggio v. Retirement Board of the Teachers' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Demerritt v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Brei v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Estate of KingNew York Surrogate's Court · 2003
- Demerritt v. LevittNew York Supreme Court · 1978