Legal Opinion
Peerless Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1956No. Civ. 16741PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this case we granted a rehearing for the sole purpose of giving further consideration to the question whether one excess insurance policy of the Underwriters at Lloyd’s should to some extent contribute in the loss here involved, with respect to which point Lamb v. Belt Cas. Co., 3 Cal.App.2d 624 [40 P.2d 311] was called to our attention by the petition for rehearing only. Thereafter Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indem. Co., 143 Cal.App.2d 453 [299 P.2d 952], which involved a similar point, was decided. Finally, Prudential Assurance Company, Ltd., a corporation, Andrew Weir…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- McFarland v. Chicago Exp., Inc. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Employers' Ins. Co. Of Boston, MassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Air Transport Manufacturing Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Olympic Insurance v. Employers Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.