Legal Opinion

Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1984No. 83—1083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The issue central to this action is whether the medical malpractice claim of the plaintiff, John W. Unger, is barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, par. 138.5(a).) The plaintiff alleged that while he was employed by Continental Assurance Company (CAC), he received a physical examination. The examination was performed by the plaintiff’s co-employee, defendant Dr. Carl R. Hines, who allegedly failed to diagnose the plaintiff’s lung cancer until repeat chest X rays were taken almost one year after the initial examination. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sjostrom v. SprouleIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. McCormick v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Martin v. Kralis Poultry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Komel v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. McNeil v. DiffenbaughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Burgess v. Chicago Sun-TimesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Young v. St. Elizabeth HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API