California Improvement Co. v. Baroteau
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. F. W. Henshaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from á judgment in favor of defendants, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The notice of the motion for a new trial is based alone upon “ insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision”; and all the questions raised by the appellant rest upon the insufficiency of the evidence.
Respondents contend that there can be here no review of the evidence, because: 1. The appeal from the judgment was not taken' until more than sixty days after it was rendered; and 2. That appellants’ notice of intention to move for a new trial was not given in time:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Shinn v. CumminsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Biagi v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Burton v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.