Burton v. Todd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County refusing to settle a statement on a motion for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court made after final judgment, dismissing and refusing to settle a statement on motion for a new trial.
The facts essential to an understanding of the question involved are as follows: —
Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant February 5, 1885.
Notice in writing of the filing of the fihdings and rendition of judgment was duly served upon plaintiff’s attorney February 9, 1885.
On the thirteenth day of February, 1885, the judge of the Superior Court, by an order made ex parte, without notice to or consent of attorney for defendant,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brichman v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Cottle v. LeitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by11 opinions
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Smith v. IbosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- California Improvement Co. v. BaroteauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.