Legal Opinion

Pirocchi v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-1375PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FOGEL, District Judge.

This action against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual), the Workmen’s Compensation insurance carrier of plaintiff Alfred Pirocchi’s employer, requires us to determine the nature and scope of the duty, if any, owed to a claimant who asserts that the failure to preserve physical evidence has destroyed his cause of action against a third party.

Defendant Liberty Mutual seeks a judgment in its favor under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, based on the record now before us, which includes the pleadings, affidavits and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Edward Aaron Mays v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Brown v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Pascarella v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Smith v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Coleman v. Eddy Potash, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Koplin v. Rosel Well Perforators, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API