Legal Opinion

Pascarella v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1954No. Appeal, 299PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

Defendants, S. A. Whitney & Company and Kelley, appeal from the refusal of their motions for new trial and judgment n.o.v. in a trespass action for property damage alleged to have resulted from various negligent acts of defendants. Coleman, another defendant, permitted plaintiffs to take judgment against him by default, and is not a party to this appeal.

Taking the facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs, as we are bound to do, the following appears: In 1947 and prior thereto plaintiffs owned and operated a hotel in the city of Bradford, the building…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Loch v. ConfairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Grimes v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Reitmeyer v. SprecherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Cantwell v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Abbott v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API