Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. Nelson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From tlie Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, C. J.

The appellee sued the appellant, to recover the value of wood alleged to have been burned by the negligence of the appellant.

Issue ^ trial by a jury, verdict for the appellee; motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

The errors assigned are:

1. That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause, of action.

2. That the court erred in overruling a motion in arrest of judgment.

3. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The first and second assignments of error present the same question, and will be considered together.

The substance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Gagg v. VetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. ParamoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. WandIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Anderson v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API