Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION...............................................................388
LEGAL BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS OF FACT..............................390
I. Jurisdiction.........................................................390
II. Relevant Statutory and Regulatory Provisions.........................390
III. The Presumption of Validity and the Standard of Proof................391
IV. The Parties.........................................................391
V. Background of the ’ 052 Patent........................................392
A.…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Janssen Products, L.P. v. Lupin Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Petito v. Puritan's Pride, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.