Legal Opinion
Hamilton Products, Inc. v. O'Neill
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 15, 2007No. 5:05-cv-00455PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HODGES, District Judge.
This action concerning United States Patent No. 6,834,621 B1 (“the '621 patent”), and related confidentiality and licensing agreements, is before the Court for consideration of the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40), to which the pro se Defendant has responded (Docs. 44 & 48). The Defendant holds the '621 patent, which in general terms describes a device designed to function as the equivalent of a seatbelt restraint for pets in automobiles; the '621 patent is titled, “Animal Restraint System and Universal Seat Buckle.” The claims of the '621 patent at…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2013