Commonwealth v. Collazo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
The issue is whether a Terry1 stop is lawful where a citizen approaches a police officer and describes the suspect and his alleged criminal activity with particular specificity. We find that the Terry stop is lawful.
Appellant was convicted of Possession of Marijuana, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(81), and sentenced to thirty days probation and a $100.00 fine. He argues on appeal that the drugs that were recovered, as well as his post-arrest statements, should have been suppressed. He also claims he was entitled to a jury trial. We affirm.
The trial court opinion set forth the following…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MayberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. StokesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ArchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PrengleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McCleaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. HaywardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ThranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. Caudell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.