Sullivan v. Board of Supervisors
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — D. F. Coyle, Judge. Appeals from assessments of.benefits in Drainage District No. 95, in Palo Alto County, Iowa. The two cases were consolidated for trial in the district court, and by agreement of parties, are consolidated on this appeal, and presented on a single record, the same as in the court below.' —
1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.
— I. The drainage district comprises about 1,000 acres of land, lying, the long way, from north to south. It is, between the meandered lines of the district, about a section and a half wide at the north end, and is of approximately that width two thirds of its length, and widens out to about two sections in width at the south end, where the lands of appellants are located, the district being located in Sections 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, and 20, Township 79, Range 34. The general slope of the district is from the north to the south, with some variations. From the north end of the district down to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wright County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- McGrath v. People ex rel. LinnemeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Jackson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Smedley v. KirbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924