Jackson v. Board of Supervisors
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Sac District Court. — Hon. M. E. Hutchinson, Judge. Appeal from an assessment of benefits to plaintiff’s land, due to the establishment of a drainage district, which embraced the property. Plaintiff appealed, from the assessment made by' the Board of Supervisors, to the District Court of Sac County, and upon that appeal the assessments were confirmed and approved, and from that finding he appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
What is known as drainage district No. 19-26 of Sac and Buena Vista counties was regularly established by joint action of the boards of supervisors of said counties. The .proposed plan of the engineer was adopted; ditches and drains were constructed according to these plans in due course; and assessments were made, for the cost of the improvement, upon the lands within the district according to the recommendations of the engineer in charge of the work.
Plaintiff owns the N. E. of the N. W. and the N. W. of the N. W. of section 4, each being fractional quarters, lying along the north line of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zinser v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- In re the Location & Establishment of Drainage District No. 3Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Collins v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beh v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wright County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Conklin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DreessenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.