Legal Opinion

Arzola v. Doneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants George Doneca, Jilijana Doneca, and Daniela Doneca appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated May 9, 1999, which denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and failed to decide that branch of their motion which was for leave to enter judgment on their cross claim against the defendant Rhea Finishing, Inc., upon its failure to answer the cross complaint.

*423Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Roark v. HuntingNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Stewart v. HaleviymAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Verdino v. AlexandrouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Velez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schor v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Palopoli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. O'Garro v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Albuja v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Muro v. RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API