Muro v. Romano

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated May 1, 2002, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Peter Romano and Marie Romano which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

*583Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

An owner of property is under no duty to pedestrians to remove snow and ice that naturally accumulates upon the public sidewalk abutting his or her…