Legal Opinion
Schor v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated January 29, 2002, as granted the respective motions of the defendants Cygler Kings Highway Family, L.P., and Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., the defendant M&A Auto Repair Center, Inc., and the defendant King Radiator Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cresvale International, Inc. v. Reuters America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Sheehan v. RubensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Trabolse v. RizzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Velez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gibbs v. Rochdale Village, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crudo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Santiago v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Bisontt v. Rockaway One Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- O'Garro v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003