Legal Opinion
ASSAAD
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2003No. ID 3487PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 553
(BIA 2003) Interim Decision #3487 In re Bassel Nabih ASSAAD, Respondent File A72 824 993 - Houston Decided February 12, 2003 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Case law of the United States Supreme Court holding, in the context of criminal proceedings, that there can be no deprivation of effective assistance of counsel where there is no constitutional right to counsel does not require withdrawal from Matter of Lozada,
19 I&N Dec. 637
(BIA 1988), aff’d,
857 F.2d 10
(1st Cir. 1988), finding a right to assert a…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Oscar Rojas-Garcia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert S. Coleman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- T-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- S-L-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- Jian Yun Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bassel Nabih Assaad v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.