Legal Opinion

Bishop v. City of Meriden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is a reservation bringing before us certain questions arising upon a demurrer to a substituted complaint. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff is the owner of certain premises in the defendant city fronting upon Highland Avenue; that the city, on June 4th, 1928, accepted that avenue as a public highway and established along it certain street and curb lines and grades; that thereafter proceedings were taken to assess benefits and award damages on account of these improvements, and as regards all those affected benefits and damages were found to be equal; that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Fox v. City of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Bishop v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Tyler v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. McIsaac v. HaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Novogroski v. MacDonaldConnecticut Superior Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API