Legal Opinion

Sango v. Sango

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1924No. 15006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, O.

The plaintiff in error in this court was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant in -the court below, and they will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, Dora 'Sango, sued her husband, Edward Sango, for an obsiolute di vorce, for the custody of their two minor children, Edward Sango, Jr., and Thelma Sango, age nine and six years, respectively, for alimony in -the um of $20 per month fertile support and education of the children, the sum of $50 attorney's fees, and expenses of prosecuting her action, charging the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tobin v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Derritt v. DerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Sango v. SangoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Manhart v. ManhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. West v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API