Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. Joos

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1924No. Civ. No. 4691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

Judgment having been given for the plaintiff and respondent in a suit in unlawful detainer, the defendant appealed and furnished undertaking for an attempted stay of execution, and the sureties thereon justified pursuant to notice. About six months later respondent moved the court for an order to require a new bond upon the ground that the sureties had become insufficient, and such order being granted, new sureties were furnished, but after several continuances of the hearing failed to qualify.

Appellant contends that execution was stayed, and here seeks a supersedeas, contending (1) that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. In re SkerrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hegeler v. HenckellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Bateman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Miles v. JohansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API