Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs-three immigrant teenagers who entered the United States without inspection as unaccompanied minors-bring this putative class action, alleging that, upon reaching their respective eighteenth birthdays, Defendants transferred them to adult detention facilities without considering less restrictive placements in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1232(c)(2)(B). Plaintiffs also contend that Defendants routinely and systematically fail to abide by this statutory provision. Presently…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Damus v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.