Legal Opinion

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 24, 2018No. Civil Action No. 18-406 (JEB)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) are two nonprofit organizations dedicated to informing the public about governmental actions. In this suit for injunctive and declaratory relief, they allege that former head of the Environmental Protection Agency Scott Pruitt and the Agency itself have been intentionally flouting the Federal Records Act by failing both to create certain records and to maintain a proper records-management policy. They also allege…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Amaplat Mauritius Ltd. v. Zimbabwe Mining Development CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. America First Legal Foundation v. BecerraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. American Oversight v. HegsethDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API