Legal Opinion

United States v. White Horse

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 13, 2001No. CR. 01-50002-01-KESPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SCHREIER, District Judge.

The United States of America moves to exclude the proposed expert testimony of Dr. Donald A. Janz. Defendant, Guy Randy White Horse, opposes the motion.

FACTS

White Horse, a Native American, is charged with sexually abusing his son on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. White Horse’s attorney hired Dr. Janz to conduct a psychosexual evaluation of White Horse. This evaluation included a mental status examination and clinical interview of White Horse and the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest (“Abel Assessment”). Dr. Janz concluded that White…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Grady William PowersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Patrick Joseph GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Clifton WatersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2000

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. BockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. United States v. Guy Randy White HorseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. In re M.P.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. United States v. BirdsbillDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2003
  5. State v. HatchettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API