Legal Opinion

State v. Hatchett

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2014No. 26664PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant Christopher Hatchett was convicted of first-degree burglary in violation of SDCL 22-32-1 and obstructing a law enforcement officer in violation of SDCL 22-11-6, after fleeing from a police officer into an occupied apartment and forcing the door closed against the officer. Hatchett appeals, alleging that obstructing law enforcement is not a sufficient predicate offense to support the charge of first-degree burglary. Hatchett also claims the trial court erred by allowing the State to exercise a peremptory strike motivated by race and that the trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rice v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. St. CloudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wyman v. BrucknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Olson, Blake, Massie v. Butte County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Healy Ranch v. MinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Paul Nelson Farm v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API