Legal Opinion
United States v. Birdsbill
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 24, 2003No. CR 02-72-GF-CCLPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOVELL, Senior District Judge.
On the morning of January 15, 2003, the third day of trial in the above-captioned criminal matter, the Court granted the government’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony. The Motion was opposed by the Defendant, who had desired to present the testimony of Dr. Michael Scolatti to the jury.
Due to the press of trial, the Court was unable to issue a written decision detailing its reasons for granting the government’s motion. As promised by the Court, this Order details the factors considered by the Court before granting the Motion to Exclude Expert…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jane Doe, a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian and Mother, Alisa Rudy-Glanzer v. Elroy "Bud" Glazer, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. White HorseDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Buck v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- In re M.P.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Blake-TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. Fortin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.