Legal Opinion
Patsy Copeland v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2014No. 13-11095PublishedCited by 239 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Patsy Copeland brought this action under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s administrative decision that Copeland is not disabled as defined by the Act. Specifically, the Commissioner found that Copeland was not entitled to disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 423(d)(1)(A), 1382c(a)(3). The district court dismissed Copeland’s complaint. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bradley Lewis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Newton v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Patricia GREENSPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Don E. LEGGETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley E. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Perez v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by239 opinions
- Olivia Kneeland v. Nancy Berryhill, Acting CmsnrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- James Barrett v. Nancy Berryhill, Acting CmsnrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Adams v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
- Daniels v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Phyllis Frisby v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting CmsnrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.