Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Sheehan-Bartling, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1960No. 9763-aPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.

The contract entered into between plaintiff Alton G. Anderson and defendant Sheehan-Bartling, Inc., was in the form of a written order executed by plaintiff and accepted by the defendant. The order for two motor scrapers described as Michigan Models 110 was prepared on July 7, 1958, but not then executed. Payment was to be made by the acceptance of two scrapers owned by the plaintiff at ihe agreed value of $9,500 and by the delivery of bankable paper for the balance.

Plaintiff and a salesman for defendant company went to Benton Harbor, Michigan, where plaintiff at the factory inspected and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. First National Realty Corporation v. Warren-Ehret Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Young v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Anderson v. Sheehan-Bartling, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API