People v. Holmes
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Defendant was tried without a jury and found guilty of selling narcotics in violation of former section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code.1 The decisive question raised by this appeal is whether he waived a trial by jury in the manner required by the California Constitution. We have concluded that he did not.
Our Constitution declares that the right of trial by jury shall be secured to all and remain inviolate. Prior to 1928 this right could not be waived in a criminal case in which the defendant was charged with a felony. In that year the Constitution was amended, and section 7 of article I…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. PecharCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. SpinatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.