Legal Opinion

Gossett v. Van Egmond

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1945PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

This was an action for damages for the death of the plaintiff’s minor son through the alleged negligence of the minor son of the defendant.

The amended complaint states, in substance, as follows: The defendant, Henry Van Egmond, is the father of John Van Egmond. On August 8, 1941, the date of the accident herein involved, John Van Egmond was twenty years of age, and resided in his father’s home as a member of his family. Henry Van Egmond owned a certain Ford V-8 sedan, which was bought and used by him and his family in his farm business and as a family car. John Van Egmond was a careless,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gardiner v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hopkins v. DroppersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bolton v. SCHIMMINGOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Carter v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API