Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Breetwor
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1962No. Civ. 25889PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.
Two separate actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens against the same parcel of real property and the same defendants were consolidated for trial. The ease was tried without a jury and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff Colich Construction Company (“Colich”) in the amount of $3,213 and in favor of plaintiff Phillip Bailey doing business as Bailey Construction Co. (“Bailey”) in the sum of $3,818. Defendants, owners of the property, Saul J. Breetwor and Beverly Breetwor (“Breetwor”), appeal from the judgment.
Viewed most favorably to the plaintiffs, the following is a summary of material…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Ellison v. Jackson Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Western Lithograph Co. v. Vanomar ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tipton v. TiptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- California Grocers Assn. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- US Ecology, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Glickman v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Brian Construction & Development Co. v. BrighentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.