Legal Opinion
Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 8, 1975No. Docket Nos. 45438, 45929PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages arising out of a series of disputes between plaintiff Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc., and defendant The Silent Watchman Corporation, 1 franchisee and franchisor, respectively, for a recording time lock system service. The trial court’s findings favored defendant. Plaintiff appeals the judgment and the order requiring plaintiff to post an undertaking to stay the judgment pending appeal.
A recording time lock system replaces an ordinary door lock. The system, either mechanical or electro-mechanical,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re Estate of RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.