Municipal Paving Co. v. Herring
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by D. A. Herring and another against the Municipal Paving Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
Action by D. A. Herring and Bert Hahn against the Municipal Paving Company, for recovery upon a contract. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. The parties will be designated as in the court below.
The defendant contends that its motion to quash service should have been sustained. The defendant is a foreign corporation, with its offices in Dallas, Tex. It appears from the record that plaintiff filed his action in the district court of Pontotoc county and had summons issued, directed to the sheriff of that county, who returned the same unserved, stating that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sankey & Shorter v. Columbus Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Couch v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Hanthorn v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Breinig v. SparrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- L. J. Mestier & Co. v. A. Chevalier Pavement Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Standard Paving Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Price v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Champlin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Kaw Boiler Works v. FrymyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.