Legal Opinion

Schueler v. Martin

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 13, 1996No. Civ. A. 93C-12-258-JOHPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERLIHY, Judge.

The matter before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment brought by defendant City of Newark [Newark]. The specific issue is the ability of plaintiff to recover punitive damages from Newark.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Newark and codefendant David Martin [Martin] previously moved for partial summary judgment. As will be described shortly in more detail, this is an action against the defendants for injuries suffered by plaintiff Warren F. Schueler [Schueler]. Martin was a Newark police officer when the events occurred giving rise to this lawsuit.

Martin’s motion for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. CatesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Billops v. Magness Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  2. Robinson v. ClemonsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1998
  3. Hall v. McGuiganSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999
  4. Castellani v. Delaware State PoliceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Yardley v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API