Yardley v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERLIHY, Judge.
The matter before the Court is defendant U.S. Healthcare, Inc.’s [USH] motion for summary judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The essential facts are not in dispute. John B. Yardley [Mr. Yardley], a Delaware resident, was employed by Mars Electronics [Mars] in West Chester, Pennsylvania. Mars offered healthcare benefits through USH. There is an apparent factual dispute between the parties over whether Mr. Yard-ley “chose” to be covered by a Pennsylvania healthcare plan or a Delaware healthcare plan. He chose a Delaware doctor as his primary care physician. It is unclear if this choice…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Carpenter v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Peterson v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015
- Walls v. USAA General Indemnity CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2025