Legal Opinion

State Bar of California v. Statile

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 2008No. A118124PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

Respondent William J. Statile, a former attorney, settled lawsuits brought by parties alleging that he had misappropriated trust funds. The settling plaintiffs reserved their right to seek additional reimbursement from the Client Security Fund (CSF), administered by appellant State Bar of California (State Bar or the bar). Those same settling plaintiffs (as well as a trustee of a separate trust alleging wrongdoing by Statile) applied for reimbursement from the CSF, which reimbursed them for losses allegedly caused by Statile. The State Bar brought this action for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Pacific Lumber Co. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anthony Kassas v. State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. People v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. County of Santa Clara v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Allianz Global Risk U.S. Insurance v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Barickman v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API