Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Metropolitan Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 21, 1878PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

This is an information in equity filed by the attorney general, at the relation of Eben Jordan and others, occupiers of land abutting on Washington Street in the city of Boston. As it was first filed, it alleged that the defendant corporation, under the authority of an order of the board of aldermen of the city of Boston, was about to lay down two parallel street railway tracks in Washington Street, between Temple Place and Summer Street, and to run its cars thereon; that it was impossible to lay down these tracks, so as to leave sufficient space for ordinary vehicles to pass between either…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Hartford Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  2. Attorney General v. Tudor Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Elliott v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  4. Bay State Brick Co. v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Cushing v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Pierce v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Attorney General v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Lorain Steel Co. v. Norfolk & Bristol Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API