Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Peters
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 24, 2007No. Civil Action H-05-3689PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs disparate impact claim and claim for enforcement of alleged finding and order. Dkt. 22. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was filed pursuant to any one of rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), or 56. Plaintiff argues that the motion should be reviewed under a rule 56 standard. The court agrees. Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is converted to a rule 56 motion for summary judgment. Also, pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 21. Upon consideration of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- INDIANAPOLIS CHAPTER OF NAACP v. BallardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010
- Brown v. AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Ortega v. ChertoffDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Pickney v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2022