Legal Opinion
Ortega v. Chertoff
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided October 20, 2008No. 6:07-cv-00285PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Defendant’s Motion”) (Doc. No. 24), “Plaintiffs Responses [sic] to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Plaintiffs Response”) (Doc. No. 29), and “Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Defendant’s Reply”) (Doc. No. 34). For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
The following derives from Defendant’s Motion, which includes Defendant’s Proposed Undisputed Facts (“Proposed Undisputed Facts”)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Angus v. MayorkasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022