Legal Opinion

Hurley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1978No. 76-1818PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

This dispute arises in the labyrinth of Federal Civil Service regulations. We are called upon to review the district court which reviewed and affirmed the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Review (Board) which reviewed and reversed the Civil Service Commission (CSC) hearing examiner.

SCOPE OF OUR REVIEW

It is not our prerogative to substitute our judgment for that of the Board. The decision of the Board is to be given nearly every presumption of validity that the law presently grants to any administrative adjudication. Since this appeal involves no issues of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StanisicSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Albert Gueory v. Robert E. Hampton (Chairman of the United States Civil Service Commission)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. Ulysses S. Vigil v. Post Office Department of the United States of America and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Diana M. Maulding v. Louis W. Sullivan, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Wilder v. ProkopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Phillips v. BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  5. Fordelia M. Gleason v. Ben S. MalcomCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API