Legal Opinion

GIBBONS v. BRIMM Et Ux.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1951No. 7596PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This case follows a familiar pattern. An elderly person, (in this instance the aunt, Catharine S. Gibbons) having some property and an unusual affection for a younger relative (her niece, the defendant, Hilda A. Brimm) conveys her property to her niece for which the latter is to provide her a home and care during the remainder of her lifetime; and as is fairly common in this type of situation, human frailties-cause the plan to go awry. At the time of 'the- agreement the plaintiff, ’ herein sometimes called Aunt Catharine, was aged 75 and in ill health; she owned a home1 and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Payette v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Deseret National Bank v. DinwoodeyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Maxfield v. SainsburyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Hogevoll v. HogevollMontana Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. JojolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Walker v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH v. BURGI Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH v. BURGI Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API