GIBBONS v. BRIMM Et Ux.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
This case follows a familiar pattern. An elderly person, (in this instance the aunt, Catharine S. Gibbons) having some property and an unusual affection for a younger relative (her niece, the defendant, Hilda A. Brimm) conveys her property to her niece for which the latter is to provide her a home and care during the remainder of her lifetime; and as is fairly common in this type of situation, human frailties-cause the plan to go awry. At the time of 'the- agreement the plaintiff, ’ herein sometimes called Aunt Catharine, was aged 75 and in ill health; she owned a home1 and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Payette v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Deseret National Bank v. DinwoodeyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Maxfield v. SainsburyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Hogevoll v. HogevollMontana Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. JojolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Walker v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH v. BURGI Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH v. BURGI Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1952