Legal Opinion

Jose Buenrostro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2012No. 12-71253PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner Jose Luis Buenrostro was tried and convicted of conspiracy to manufacture more than thirty-one kilograms of methamphetamine. Because Buenrostro had two prior felony drug convictions, the district court sentenced him to a mandatory minimum term of life imprisonment without parole. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 851(d)(1), 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). We affirmed Buenrostro’s conviction on direct appeal. See United States v. Buenrostro, 163 F.3d 608 (9th Cir.1998). He then moved the district court to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which the district court denied on the merits.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Jermont Cox v. Martin HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. FelicianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Rudin v. MylesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Robert Jones, Jr. v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API