Legal Opinion

Stauffer v. Exley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1950No. 12258_1PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought for the recovery of damages arising out of alleged acts of unfair competition and for the issuance of an injunction against the commission of future similar acts. A separate trial was had on the issue of jurisdiction, following which the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court found that appellant, Stauffer System, Inc., is a corporation of California and that both individual appellant and appellee are citizens and inhabitants of California. It also found that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Duncan v. StuetzleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API