Legal Opinion

Herron v. Seizak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1983No. 1400PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This action was initiated by appellants who are the parents of appellee, Mona Seizak and the grandparents of Patricia Mae Seizak. Appellants seek a court order directing appellees to permit them to visit with the appellees’ daughter, Patricia Mae Seizak, who was three years of age when the complaint was filed. Patricia resides with her parents who are married to each other. The lower court sustained preliminary objections raised by appellees and dismissed the complaint. We affirm.

Our research has disclosed no cases in Pennsylvania in which our courts have addressed the factual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cutler v. CutlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Morris v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Williams v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Zaffarano v. GenaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. D.P. v. G.J.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Ibn-Sadiika v. RiesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. RM v. Baxter Ex Rel. TMSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Douglas v. Brookville Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API